The only Beatles album to occasion negative, even hostile reviews, there are few other rock records as controversial as Let It Be. First off, several facts need to be explained: although released in May 1970, this was not their final album, but largely recorded in early 1969, way before Abbey Road. Phil Spector was enlisted in early 1970 to do some post-production mixing and overdubs, but he did not work with the band as a unit. And, although his use of strings has generated much criticism, by and large he left the original performances to stand as is: only "The Long and Winding Road" and (to a lesser degree) "Across the Universe" and "I Me Mine" get the Wall of Sound treatment. The main problem was that the material wasn't uniformly strong, and that the Beatles themselves were in fairly lousy moods due to intergroup tension. All that said, the album is on the whole underrated, even discounting the fact that a substandard Beatles record is better than almost any other group's best work. McCartney in particular offers several gems: the gospel-ish "Let It Be," which has some of his best lyrics; "Get Back," one of his hardest rockers; and the melodic "The Long and Winding Road," ruined by Spector's heavy-handed overdubs. The folky "Two of Us," with John and Paul harmonizing together, was also a highlight. Most of the rest of the material, by contrast, was going through the motions to some degree, although there are some good moments of straight hard rock in "I've Got a Feeling" and "Dig a Pony." As flawed and bumpy as it is, it's an album well worth having, as when the Beatles were in top form here, they were as good as ever. [In November 2003, the Beatles released an alternate version of Let It Be called Let It Be... Naked, which mixed out Spector's contributions and deleted snippets of conversation scattered throughout the album. "Dig It" and "Maggie Mae" were cut from the record in favor of "Don't Let Me Down," which was placed in the middle of an album that now had a considerably different sequencing than the originally released version of Let It Be.] ~ Richie Unterberger, All Music Guide
As goes most works of art, appreciation of all fascets are left over time to promt discusson on the good and bad points of each. Spector's hand put it in record form good or bad for us to hear- something the boys couldn't do on their own or at least agree to do so it is what it is. I love it, and the big picture of it has no bubble gum or psychodelic overtones George Martin would have let them do.
Again, I do not think he ruined it as Dr. Mike states, Let it be has a great original "feel" to it not much like the other Beatles albums, I think Spector picked up on the natural vibe they put forth and expounded on it, you know , like the logical extension of where the music was going. A fresh sound and production. Great songs great album start to finish. The Beatles knew what they were doing as both John and George worked with him again.
A good Beatles album ruined by Phil Spector. This was not the Ronettes Phil. What were you thinking? Sorry Phil, I guess it wasn't your fault. You were just doing what you do (over producing). What were John, George & Ringo thinking when they handed this over to you? Fortunately McCartney saved this project years later by releasing Naked. Only wish he had tacked on the rooftop concert as bonus tracks.
I agree with applemaste as far as this is not as good as most of their other albums (Abbey Road, Rubber Soul, Sgt. Pepper, Revolver, etc.) but it does have some great highlights. Get Back, 2 of Us, Across the Universe, I Me Mine, and The Long & Winding Road are excellent songs. They may not be "classic" Beatles, but what ever was? This band was so diverse it's hard to say what was "typical" and "atypical".
I think it's a great collection of songs, and I think Phil did a great job.
I don't care what what the prevailing attitude towards this album is, I find myself returning to this album time and time again to enjoying every minute and note of it.
It's not spectacular when compared to Rubber Soul, Abbey Road, or Revolver, but The Beatles have made better and worse albums anyway. Let it Be is not a Beatles album because it has more Beatles in it, and it's not meant to sound like some of Help! combined with some of Magical Mystery and some more of Sgt. Peppers. It is a Beatles album because it is a sequel to Abbey Road and The White Album and it is new and different. It's not more Beatles, it's new Beatles. Don't listen for more Beatles.
If you're looking for these songs as the Beatles intended them to be heard, "Let It be...Naked" will be the better option. But if you're willing to experience this music as an important part of the Beatles' history, take the album for a listen or two, without any expectations. You'll find a new understanding of the painful relations between these four guys at this time, along with an appreciation of the beautiful music they were still able to make.
I first listened to "Let it Be" after listening to every other Beatles album from "Rubber Soul" to "Abbey Road." I just could not help to be disappointed with "Let It Be" at first, for quite some time. I finally stopped dissing it as an average Beatles album and accepted it as a fine album on its own. After I did that I came to like the album much more. Don't go into this album looking for groundbreaking Beatle sound. If you do, you will be let down. It's still definitely worth a look.