What's up with the raunchy cover? Doesn't make up for generic music! Thanks for raping my eyes - LOL
|
||
I don't personally care about the music. I'm deaf. LOVE TITTIES, THO!! haha, j/k Good band.
|
||
yall make a big deal about seeing titties yall act like little a** kids like yall never seen titties before grow the f**k up !!
|
||
Wow! A new favorite! Kind of a mix of Linkin Park and Charlie Sexton. I'm female and I don't have a problem with the cover...
|
||
this band sucks... and the cover is distasteful. i don't want to see that! and for those of you who are about to attack my personal opinion, GO TO HELL.
|
||
The album is called PassionLeave s A T r a c e . . . why wouldn't they have a topless woman on their cover?
|
||
It's a nicely composed cover; it's just pretty picture.
|
||
You're right. The music does KICK BUTT! That's exactly why I"m confused as to why this band felt the need use a topless woman as their cover art. Are they afraid they won't gain attention for their music's merit alone? What relevence does a naked woman have in this context, other than to shock/titila t e ? Disapointing .
|
||
People need to grow up and stop crying about little things.. like words and nudity... this music sucks anyways..
|
||
I've decided that putting naked girls on your cover probably earns you more initial attention and fewer sales
also this blows |
||
haha! the pic doesnt even LOOK real, no white girl would have tata's that dark!
|
||
The album cover on Amazon has what looks like a simple MS Paint edit to the original. It's not a photo, it's just a drawing (granted it's a pretty detailed drawing) but it's one of those that crosses the line of art a bit too much for general distribution .
|
||
is it legal to post this unedited album cover? they edited nirvana's album, the one with the naked baby, cover
|
| report abuse |
Portions of content provided by All Music Guide © 2006 All Media Guide, LLC.