After Radiohead stubbornly refused to accept the mantle of "world's biggest and most important rock band" by releasing the willfully strange rocktronica fusion Kid A in 2000, Coldplay stepped up to the plate with their debut, Parachutes. Tasteful, earnest, introspective, anthemic, and grounded in guitars, the British quartet was everything Radiohead weren't but what the public wanted them to be, and benefited from the Oxford quintet's decision to abandon rock stardom for arcane art rock. Parachutes became a transatlantic hit and 2002's sequel, A Rush of Blood to the Head, consolidated their success by being bigger and better than Parachutes, positioning Coldplay to not be just the new Radiohead, but the new U2: a band that belongs to the world but fans believe that the music is for them alone. To that end, Coldplay's third album, X&Y -- slightly delayed so it follows Rush of Blood by nearly three years, but that's no longer than the time separating OK Computer and Kid A, or The Unforgettable Fire and The Joshua Tree -- is designed to be the record that elevates Coldplay to the major leagues, where they are at once the biggest and most important band in the world. It's deliberate and sleek, cinematic and pristine, hip enough to sample Kraftwerk and blend in fashionable retro-'80s post-punk allusions without altering the band's core. Indeed, X&Y is hardly a bold step forward, but rather a consolidation of Coldplay's strengths, particularly their skill at crafting surging, widescreen epics. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide
After reading this particular critics constant anihilation of The Killers albums, I was shocked to my very core at his glowing (albeit vague)review of X+Y. Particularly because, while I love Coldplay and love many song on X+Y, I don't think it was the groups strongest album. This critic is an interesting guy......He rambles on about how ridiculous The Killers are, in particular making fun of the lead singers name and here he basically gives X + Y a thumbs up, yet hardly says a word about it.
Wow, who writes this stuff? This review is a full consolation of Coldplay's history and development as a group leading up to the sound that makes this album. Nice.
@ dhphoto.08: Why leave a comment here if you don't like them? This page is for people to talk about why we like Coldplay. If you don't like them, go listen to someone else.
I agree with the comment by "jackyboywow". If the success of musicians is solely based on their ability to "change" music, we would lose out on a lot of great material. In the end, I feel that all you can hope for is to create the most endearing music possible. With that, I believe Coldplay succeeded with this record. Yes it does have some qualities that resemble other groups, but what group doesn't? Everyone is influenced by somebody, that is just how it works.
I think the Coldplay/Radiohead comparison was created by Capital Records to protect sales--they saw a popular market and wanted to keep it going. I personally feel very differently about the two bands. Coldplay is shallower and palatable (sometimes more listenable) and true to the U2 formula. Radiohead is always breaking new ground--they're not always as accessible, but much more of a revelation after a few listens. Both bands are great.
So sick of the constant comparisons made about bands: "This one's just like that one, only better/worse." If you can't hear the subtle differences, then go listen to the whistling of your head in a cross-wind. No two bands are the same.
YEAH RIGHT! they are way better than those two. are you kidding me?even if Coldplay turns out better or worse than U2 they will not be a rip-off of U2..
Coldplay > Radiohead with that being said going mainstream doesn't always mean you are selling out. It can mean you are getting payed alot more to do what you already do. Not everyone has to change there music to make it big, in fact they get more funding to make it more how they would like it to sound. It doesn't always make you a sheep if everyone else likes the group, Its possible the group is just really good.
That's not a real award, people hater. And I think he is only making comparisons to the time that Radiohead and coldplay took to make a new album after their hit records. Lighten up a little. Change your diaper.
You must be kidding.... this album does not even nearly resemble Kid A, I'm sorry but Coldplay is by no means the new Radiohead, Radiohead is on a league of it's own, very far from melodramatic , formulaic pop songs that appeal to lazy people with no knowledge of real music. I applaud Radiohead for their efforts to refuse ludicrous awards, and for not selling out to the mainstream, always staying true to making the music they want to make, and not striving to be what the "public wants them to be