Two years after the Lindsey Buckingham/Stevie Nicks/Christine McVie-less incarnation of Fleetwood Mac crashed and burned, their classic '70s lineup reunited for an MTV Unplugged session and an accompanying tour. Although it's likely that the reunion was for monetary purposes, it made creative sense as well -- no members were as compelling solo as they were with the group. Despite this, the Unplugged-styled setting wasn't ideal for a reunion, since the group decided to devote nearly a quarter of The Dance to new material, inevitably resulting in unfair comparisons to their warhorses. Since there's so much new material, The Dance can't be a truly nostalgic experience either, because the new songs interrupt the flow. Not that they're bad -- both Buckingham's gentle "Bleed to Love Her" and nervy "My Little Demon" are first-rate -- but they aren't given the full-fledged production they deserve. Similarly, the older songs suffer from the slightly hollow unplugged production. All the hits are performed in nearly identical arrangements to the originals, with the exception of Buckingham's solo "Big Love" (an improvement on the original) and the addition of Tusk's marching band to "Don't Stop," which makes the differences all too apparent. Much is the same -- McVie and Nicks sound terrific, and the band is tight and professional -- but Buckingham has lost some of his range, which undercuts some of his songs. Still, that isn't enough to prevent The Dance from being an entertaining listen; it just isn't a substantial one. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide
The production didn't suck??? This review sucks. That's why bands/musicians play in front of audiences and idiot reviewers just write about it. LOSERS!!!
The review is so steeped in comparisons and concepts that it totally misses the point of the actual quality of the music and performances. It's fresh, vital and fantastic.
The reviewer is totally WRONG. This album is my favorite. I prefer this version of the songs over some of the originals. Stevie's tone is at it's best and the performance is heartfelt.
I disagree with the reviewer - (A) It's live, not unplugged...goober... (B)The new songs keep it from being another Greatest Hits compilation that the record companies are so fond of pushing.
I went to the concert in 1997. I thought this was the end for me. I was so overwhelmed to be a part of the experience. It bought me back to the summer of '77 when I was on the beach and listening to "Dreams" on WABC AM. I was only 10 years old at the time, but I knew right then and there that this would be one of the greatest moments in my life. I am now 42 years old, and it still is. One Love.
Not sure what the reviewer was expecting of this album. The production is first-rate, and the quality of the recording is exceptional. Comparable to Eric Clapton's Unplugged album, the production (and the reviewer's impression of it) underscores a fundamental problem with the music industry today. It's insiders have been listening to bad, overproduced recordings for so long that they can no longer recognize a good one when they hear it.
Uhhhhh, excuse me? Unplugged? Did you even listen to this album? Other than a couple of songs, it's not "unplugged". Just goes to prove an old saying, "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those to stupid to teach become critics".