Perhaps if the cut-'n'-paste remix record Reanimation hadn't appeared as a stopgap measure in the summer of 2002, Linkin Park's second record, Meteora, would merely have been seen as a continuation of their 2000 debut, Hybrid Theory, instead of a retreat to familiar ground. Then again, Reanimation wasn't much more than a way to buy time (along with maybe a little credibility), so it's unfair to say that its dabbling in electronica and hip-hop truly pointed toward a new direction for the group, but it did provide a more interesting listening experience than Meteora, which is nothing more and nothing less than a Hybrid Theory part two. Which isn't to say that Linkin Park didn't put any effort into the record, since it does demonstrate that the group does stand apart from the pack by having the foresight to smash all nu-metal trademarks -- buzzing guitars, lumbering rhythms, angsty screaming, buried scratching, rapped verses -- into one accessible sound which suggests hooks instead of offering them. More importantly, the group has discipline and editing skills, keeping this record at a tight 36 minutes and 41 seconds, a move that makes it considerably more listenable than its peers and, by extension, more powerful, since they know where to focus their energy, something that many nu-metal bands simply do not. (It must be said that there will surely be consumers out there that will question paying a $19.99 retail for a 36-minute-and-41-second record, though some may prefer getting a tight, listenable record at that price instead of a meandering 70-minute mess.) So, it must be said that Meteora does deliver on the most basic level -- it gives the fans what they want, and it does so with energy and without fuss. It's also without surprises, either, which again gives the album a static feeling -- suggesting not a holding pattern for the band, but rather the limits of their chosen genre, which remains so stylistically rigid and formulaic that even with a band who follows the blueprint well, like Linkin Park, it winds up sounding a little samey and insular. Since this is only their second go-round, this is hardly a fatal flaw, but the similarity of Meteora to Hybrid Theory does not only raise the question of where do they go from here, but whether there is a place for them to go at all. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide
It is funny, against criticism before the release they wanted to put out an album similar to Hybrid Theory. They were more than capable, but wanted to do so for the fans, and against the critics. F**k em, this album is awesome
This album is easily their best, next would be Hybrid Theory & Minutes to Midnight. Their lyrics are so uplifting & talks bout positive like changing your bad habits & becoming your own person. People should look to these songs as inspiration.
i identify with LP their music has never lets me down. somewhere i belong was inspiration for me at the time, and its only fitting to add that giving up is where im at in life thanks LP
Alright, who's the critic that wrote this review? I have some issues here. 1. Reanimation was NOT "cut-'n'-paste", and if you listened to the remix of Crawling, you'd realize that. 2. Reanimation was NOT just a way to buy time, nor credibility, and Meteora was NOT a retreat to familiar ground. 3. Pull your head out of your bum and actually listen to the music you review, instead of critiquing your bowel movements and changing the names to those of popular bands!
from what I've seen, the only rock albums in which a positive review was given were all by HIM (with one exception). and next to Linkin Park, which gets hate, no one likes them other than me and a few other people. that's unfair. here's a thought: judge a rock album if you have an ear for rock music. then maybe every rock band here gets at least one positive review instead of none (or all).
Not sure how people can like Minutes to Midnight and Hybrid Theory and not Meteora. Rick Rubin had his way with Linkin Park on M2M so hard they didn't even sound like a progression of themselves, nearly unrecognizable. Great band - any vocalist who uses Vicks Chloraseptic during a show to keep his throat from tearing in half is a good one!
Is it just me or does Pandora use a bunch of critics that downplay every modern rock band? Every review I have read eludes to the band being run of the mill. Why don't we get some different critics that appreciate how the bands are different instead of a bunch of uber-geeks tearing apart every band out there.
I agree with those posted below; I find Meteora fundamentally different from their previous albums, and -much- better. I'm rather surprised that Pandora chose to use such a biased review.
prejudiced music reviewer. thisalbum is their best thus far. not quite as hard as hybrid theory, but it was really good. much better than the disgrace that was minutes to midnight.
I'll admit that most of Meteora sounds quite similar to Hybrid Theory. I don't mind AT ALL. It seems that the writer of this article did not listen to "Breaking the Habit", one of my favorite songs on the album.
LP rocked and STiLL rocKiNG! This was the first Rock Band I ever heard, then I turn myself into Rock Listener. I'm planning on buying a 5 string Rouge Bass, just to start swinging and practicing, got a friend that knows a lot of music he will help me learn :D Linking Park ROCKS!
one of the few best 10-20 dollars I spent! Meteora's my #1 fav album by these guys! then Hybrid Theory (but Mike's performance in HT was by far the greatest!).
hmm. no. meteora is 2nd best of course, because hybrid theory was a good cd. This is just "yep, here's some music that's pretty good." nothing great or bad. Maybe i just feel that way because hybrid theory was like WHOA! this is new and fresh and thrashing all around. whereas this cd is like yes we are still here and by the way we thrash sometimes. still good.