Tempting as it may be, don't read the dropping of the exclamation point from Panic at the Disco's name as a sign that the emo quartet is in a rush to be taken seriously. Don't even take their blatant aping of Sgt. Pepper's on Pretty. Odd as indication that Panic at the Disco wants to be taken seriously. There doesn't seem to be a serious bone within the bodies of any of the four members, but the wondrous thing about Pretty. Odd is that it's impossible to discern what silliness is intentional and what is accidental, the product of a band discovering the Beatles long after their 2005 debut A Fever You Can't Sweat Out turned into a hit. There's a startling naïveté to PATD's sudden immersion in symphonic psychedelic pop; the band is either too young or dumb to not realize that they're putting together familiar elements wrong, or that they shouldn't be attempting the baroque ballads and vaudeville shuffles that pepper this album...but they're smart enough to send-up the opening of Pepper's, twisting the Beatles' declaration that they were now Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band around, claiming that they're they same band they always were. Of course this is a bald-faced lie, as the only clear remnants from PATD's debut are the overly complicated song titles and fussy lyrics, but few will complain as the group retain their theatrical ridiculousness while unveiling a newfound panache for pop, all derived from their desire to pattern themselves after the Beatles. Panic at the Disco are hardly the first modern rock band to slavishly follow the example of their peers -- My Chemical Romance copied every one of Queen's exaggerated moves for The Black Parade, while the Killers treated Sam's Town as if it was a Springsteen coloring book -- but PATD's clueless, audacious thievery of the Beatles pays back far greater dividends, partially because stealing from the Fab Four guarantees an emphasis on melody over style, but also because PATD shows far more humor than MCR or the Killers. That humor -- and it's possible to laugh at and laugh along with the band in equal measure here -- makes Pretty. Odd a giddy absurdity, as Panic at the Disco is determined to have it both ways: to make grand, pompous music while retaining their identity as pranksters. The album is so out of control, it's hard to tell whether the group planned Pretty. Odd to be a kaleidoscopic mess, or if occurred by happenstance, but that raggedness will appeal to the teens who loved A Fever You Can't Sweat Out, but this bafflingly blurred Brit-pop could hook in older listeners, too, either through its genuine tunefulness or through pop junkies who will marvel at how "Folkin' Around" comes startlingly close to re-creating the sound of the Byrds circa Sweetheart of the Rodeo, or how "Do You Know What I'm Seeing" is equal parts Morrissey parody and homage. It all adds up to a pretty and odd record and it erases no suspicions that the band aren't quite sure of what they're doing, but the glorious thing about Pretty. Odd is that the album works in spite of this...or perhaps because of it. Either way, this is a deliriously jumbled, left-field delight. ~ Stephen Thomas Erlewine, All Music Guide
"...it's hard to tell whether {the reviewer} planned {this review} to be a kaleidoscopic mess, or if occurred by happenstance.... Either way, this is a deliriously jumbled, left-field {head-scratcher}."
I liked the creative lyrics that the first album had. The new one is too repetitive. If I wanted to listen to the same words over and over, I would listen to my little sister talk.
This album surprised me and I'm not sure if I like it. I really enjoyed the first album; the barrelling forward at breakneck-speed was great. This I can't run to, I'm forced to stroll.(Both realistic and theoreticaly)
46 yr. old checking in here. And yes, I like the Beatles. Jessiel's thoughts are interesting, and probably shared by many PATD fans. I'm familiar with PATD because I took my daughter and a friend to a show in 2005 when they were 12. I think putting out another album with the whole theatrical theme and sound would have been career suicide. Definitely too narrow for a whole career. This sounds pretty good to me. We'll just have to see what the boys have in mind for the next one.
I bought this album after Nine in the Afternoon came out as a single. I was really put off when I listened to it for the first time because it is drastically different from their first album. The first album is so much more burlesque club, electronica. I was ready to throw it out, but decided to listen to it again and I love it. I am under 30 and love a lot of the Beatles' music. I recognized the influence immediately after the shock wore off and really appreciated it. PATD still stuck to
EVERYONE loves the Beatles; this critic in the end of all his rants; was right. It is strange to hear P!ATD sound like this, but it works, hence the title. It is odd in the pyschedelic sounding of "Day met the Night" and others, but I never regretted once buying it! It is a great album and shows how risky and creative these guys really are.
jessiel: Go to hell. Do you have any idea how big of an impact the Beatles have had on music? I'm under thirty, and I listen to the Beatles. My God, more than half my friends have Beatles songs on their iPods. Don't speak for the majority, it makes you sound like an idiot. Hopefully you never run for public office; you'd have less of the percentage of votes than the candidate for the Libertarian party. (Not dissing on Perot or anything; I just so happen to a be a Libertarian.)
I don't know who decided what "emo" was, but I would hardly consider Panic at the Disco! emo. But I loved this album, it's so eccentric! Every song is different than the last, and you just never get sick of listening to them. Much more musical than the last one, less electronic. Though, I loved the first one too. - ARB
i say the total opposite of jessiel: it's all about the music and stuff but if a band stays with the same genre then they don't necessarily have that much talent cuz all they'd do would be the same crap over and over and people would want them to shutup soon after.... so switching genres is a good thing to do, as long as it's not too drastic (heavy metal to rap would be gay)
so not true i think anyways im glad they switched up there style and lyrics from the last album, this one is easy going and just as confusing as ever :P i LOVE IT! and i am a fan of Brendon, Brent, Ryan,Spencer AND their music ^^
I liked Panic! at the Disco but this album was uncalled for. It's 2008 nobody under the age of 30 wants to listen to the beatles and the ones that do should not be aloud to live amongst the rest of the population. I think that Artists who became successful doing one style of music should not switch to another completely different style thats not what their real fans want. We are not fans of the artists themselves we are fans of their music!! So changing your music in turn makes you lose fans.
I do not agree with the review. The CD took an entirely new course from A Fever... and I believe it was unintentional. Panic just created music that they liked and i believe it is much more mature that the last album. The music is very catchy and i personally love the new album's direction and i encourage them to keep it up!
I love most songs on this album. especially nine in the afternoon, that green gentleman, when the sun met the moon, and we're so starving. just to name a few. i agree, it's way different than the first album, but just as good, if not better.
pretty odd... It's a lot different than the first album... I think I like it better though. It seems like a very experimental album, If they make a third one, that one might be better.
Pretty.Odd confuses me. I feel like I should like it, because I grew up with the Beatles and I liked Panic's first album for its campy sincerity. But there's something offputting here. It sounds pretty but- I guess it bothers me to hear what I loved as a kid reinterpreted inexpertly. It's sweet though.